首页> 外文OA文献 >Aeroelastic Response and Protection of Space Shuttle External Tank Cable Trays
【2h】

Aeroelastic Response and Protection of Space Shuttle External Tank Cable Trays

机译:航天飞机外部储罐电缆桥架的气动弹性响应和保护

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Sections of the Space Shuttle External Tank Liquid Oxygen (LO2) and Liquid Hydrogen (LH2) cable trays are shielded from potentially damaging airloads with foam Protuberance Aerodynamic Load (PAL) Ramps. Flight standard design LO2 and LH2 cable tray sections were tested with and without PAL Ramp models in the United States Air Force Arnold Engineering Development Center s (AEDC) 16T transonic wind tunnel to obtain experimental data on the aeroelastic stability and response characteristics of the trays and as part of the larger effort to determine whether the PAL ramps can be safely modified or removed. Computational Fluid Dynamic simulations of the full-stack shuttle launch configuration were used to investigate the flow characeristics around and under the cable trays without the protective PAL ramps and to define maximum crossflow Mach numbers and dynamic pressures experienced during launch. These crossflow conditions were used to establish wind tunnel test conditions which also included conservative margins. For all of the conditions and configurations tested, no aeroelastic instabilities or unacceptable dynamic response levels were encountered and no visible structural damage was experienced by any of the tested cable tray sections. Based upon this aeroelastic characterization test, three potentially acceptable alternatives are available for the LO2 cable tray PAL Ramps: Mini-Ramps, Tray Fences, or No Ramps. All configurations were tested to maximum conditions, except the LH2 trays at -15 deg. crossflow angle. This exception is the only caveat preventing the proposal of acceptable alternative configurations for the LH2 trays as well. Structural assessment of all tray loads and tray response measurements from launches following the Shuttle Return To Flight with the existing PAL Ramps will determine the acceptability of these PAL Ramp alternatives.
机译:航天飞机外部储罐的液氧(LO2)和液氢(LH2)电缆桥架的各个部分均通过泡沫突起空气动力学载荷(PAL)坡道进行了防护,以防止潜在的有害空气载荷。在美国空军阿诺德工程开发中心(AEDC)的16T跨音速风洞中使用和不使用PAL Ramp模型对飞行标准设计的LO2和LH2电缆桥架部分进行了测试,以获取有关桥架的气动弹性和响应特性的实验数据。作为确定PAL斜坡是否可以安全修改或移除的较大工作的一部分。使用全堆穿梭发射构型的计算流体动力学模拟来研究在没有保护性PAL坡道的情况下电缆桥架周围和下方的流动特性,并定义最大的横流马赫数和发射期间遇到的动态压力。这些横流条件用于建立风洞测试条件,其中还包括保守的余量。对于所有测试的条件和配置,没有遇到气动弹性不稳定性或不可接受的动态响应水平,任何测试的电缆桥架部分均未遭受可见的结构损坏。根据此气动弹性特征测试,LO2电缆桥架PAL坡道有三种可能可接受的替代方案:迷你坡道,托盘栅栏或无坡道。除-15度LH2托盘外,所有配置均已测试到最高条件。横流角。该例外是唯一的警告,也阻止了对LH2托盘提出可接受的替代配置的建议。使用现有的PAL坡道进行航天飞机返回飞行后,从发射后进行的所有托盘载荷的结构评估和托盘响应测量,将决定这些PAL坡道备选方案的可接受性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号